A costly proposition: Does Windsor's new transit plan improve accessibility to the CR42 hospital location?

Or is it an expensive plan that will encourage even more private vehicle use in the future?  In November 2019, following a year long process, Transit Windsor unveiled More Than Transit, its new public transit master plan. If approved by Windsor City Council, it will completely overhaul the city's bus routes, replacing the ones in use since 2006. Tomorrow, January 20, 2020, Windsor City Council will be asked to approve the new plan. In the Master Plan, Transit Windsor decision makers indicate a need for frequent bus service to encourage more use of public transportation.

"A bus coming less frequently than every 20 minutes can add a lot of time to an individual’s trip if they miss their connection or are a couple minutes late. This makes taking transit very inconvenient and undesirable for someone who has access to other transportation alternatives." -- More Than Transit, page 4

Yet, there is little evidence suggesting this was a priority in the new transit plan for routes to the proposed County Road 42 (CR42) hospital location.  Providing enough public transit to properly serve Windsor Regional Hospital's (WRH) planned rural location adjacent to Windsor Airport may prove to be overwhelmingly costly to both taxpayers and public transit users. So, rather than increasing transit usage, WRH - Windsor's second-largest employer – may ultimately force even more private vehicle use with their plan for the new regional hospital system. This is the exact opposite of the goal envisioned and outlined in Windsor’s new public transit plan. How is this conceivable when the new WRH healthcare and public transit systems will need to sustainably serve local residents for generations to come? Why was the CR42 site selected without realistic (and affordable) consideration of public transit? Windsor residents are entitled to explanations for these and other critical issues: Only two of the four new routes created to service CR42 will offer bus service every 15 minutes during "peak" times. The other two routes will operate much less frequently during "peak" times - just twice an hour. Nights, weekends and holidays, these new routes will offer even less service. The majority of transit users will need at least one transfer to get to the CR42 location. No direct connections will run from the planned Ouellette site Urgent Care Centre (UCC) to CR42. This will affect patients with referrals for treatment that cannot be provided at an urgent care centre. There is also no direct connection from the UCC to Hôtel-Dieu Grace Healthcare Tayfour Campus (HDGH). It's not just the patients: Public transit will be an unattractive option for healthcare workers and volunteers who don't live along direct bus routes. Many of WRH's 4,000+ healthcare workers, especially those living in neighbourhoods near Met Campus, walk to the hospital. How many will have to take more than one bus to get to CR42, making public transit an unappealing option?

Diagram (below) of the 750-metre walking route from the proposed downtown Windsor UCC to the nearest bus stop to the new hospital site based on Transit Windsor's new master plan.

For households between Howard Avenue and Lauzon Parkway, no direct bus routes are planned to the proposed new hospital site based on Transit Windsor's new master plan.

The map below highlights the 40 sq. km. area between Howard Avenue and Lauzon Parkway. The area, with 85k+ residents, has no direct hospital routes under Transit Windsor's new configuration.

This is a 40 sq. km. area encompassing the densely populated wards 4,5,6 and 8, i.e. the long-established neighbourhoods of Walkerville, South Walkerville, Fontainbleu, Riverside, East Windsor and part of Forest Glade. This area measures 7 km. from east to west. It's home to many seniors, people with impaired mobility and residents living on fixed incomes. The route configuration of Transit Windsor's new master plan creates a major impediment to efficient and affordable access to healthcare. These 4 wards in Windsor have over 85,000 residents. That's four times the population density of the next two largest communities in the entire Essex County region. Lakeshore, the second largest municipality, with 37,000 residents, is spread over 69 sq. km. Lasalle, the third largest municipality, has a population of 30,000 across 65 sq. km. For reference: Windsor, the largest municipality in Essex County, has a total population of 217,000.

If the new hospital were to be located closer to where the most people already live, the planned new public transportation system could provide better and more cost-effective reasons to take the bus.

CLICK HERE for a complete breakdown and analysis of these issues, including transit maps, schedules and data

There's no debate about the importance of access: it's the one thing everybody agrees on. How could it make sense to any planner to locate the new single site acute care hospital where it forces public transit to circumnavigate Windsor Airport? Why did hospital site decision makers not prioritize proximity to direct public transit routes that efficiently serve population-dense neighbourhoods? In an era when even the most car-centric communities in the world are investing in active transportation, is Windsor the last city still building for single vehicle use?

To Be Continued Stay tuned:  In another eblast, we'll examine more questions around Windsor's new public transit master plan.

In their own words: Members of our community continue to comment on the issues, especially about recent degrading social media activity directed towards CAMPP and its supporters on the online platforms of elected and unelected officials:

"I stand behind CAMPP 100% despite all the negativity and hatred being sent their way... this plan stinks and the process was rigged and corrupted from the onset. How on earth we even consider automobile sprawl to be an acceptable development pattern in a time when our environment, municipal finances and social well-being is at the forefront of public discussion is beyond me. The city and WRH have done literally NOTHING but push back since CAMPP began expressing concerns almost 7 years ago.... and they’ve done nothing to address the very real issues with their plan... nothing."

"The behaviour of Mayor Dilkens and Mr. Musyj raises serious questions about whether they can provide the kind of leadership (our community needs and deserves.)"

"Build hospitals where people live. The plan needs to be socially, environmentally, and financially sound. The current one is NOT. The hospital needs new leadership. Good Leadership that can listen to both side and bring people together without being insulting and condescending!"

"It strikes me that, if the province would have mounted a similar comprehensive fully public inclusive consultation process such as DRIC was for the more recent regional healthcare study...instead of entrusting our future to self-interested hospital bureaucrats in cahoots with local political hacks, producing such flawed results...the outcome would have had far more universal support...and there would be no "mega-hospital" in a bean field.!"

"If you want to sit in any chair of leadership you listen to everything that is brought to you and if you cannot, you don't belong there.   I wish more could do this, no matter their chair - mother, father, teacher, union leader, business manager, mayor."

"The  new  hospital will  have the  same  number of hospital beds that we  currently have. We have OR rooms that are closed , or unfunded as are beds unfunded. I want a clear  answer on if the new  hospital  will have  funding for opening up OR rooms and beds, that are  now unfunded or closed."

"The new hosp is a grave concern, with no increases  in beds or  services, but  a shiny new shell. In a farm field. Also questionable  judgement in leadership  financial decisions,  ie heatthy  kids program  funding declined, severe  flooding issues, road infrastructure eroding, sewer issues, not  being responsibly managed, allowing  public  buildings to  decay from  lack of proper maintenance,  all  irresponsible spending. Taxpayers left holding the  bag Generations burdened in  debt"

"The opposition is about location and not about a new hospital. But this is how the supporters of the 42 site are framing the issue. It's a classic "us versus them" situation."

"I'd be willing to hear facts refuting CAMPP's many pages of researched info."

"No reason to build on greenfield if other options are available."

"Are the people who are pro new hospital on the proposed site climate deniers? Do they deny the science of run-offs causing more water with nowhere to go."

"I have yet to meet anyone opposed to a new hospital, including CAMPP, it's the location. I'm 100% behind CAMPP as a Farmer trying to preserve farmland, as an environmentalist trying to prevent unnecessary urban sprawl and as a caring human being trying to maintain access to some of the most vulnerable people in Windsor/Essex and an area with the highest population density. Yes we deserve a new hospital, but we can do better then this."

"I don’t get [Windsor Star Columnist] Ann Jarvis. One minute she says ‘get on with the building of the new hospital’ and the next ‘ we need to stop sprawling out’."

"The location is a poor decision. If we are going to build a hospital, then build it where it will benefit the health and well being of the majority of citizens and of those most in need. I disagree with the location even more when I look at it from an environmental standpoint."